← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gus Cantwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 20 2 2 4 0.200 0.0538 0.0538 0.0486 0.0486
2021-22 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 47 15 19 34 0.723 0.1664 0.1704 0.2292 0.2347
2022-23 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 45 26 22 48 1.067 0.2453 0.2401 0.3379 0.3307
2023-24 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 45 11 26 37 0.822 0.1891 0.1760 0.2605 0.2424
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · New England College
-35.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27902
Forward overall
#1596
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.