← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gus Cantwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Cretin-Derham Hall USHS-MN 20 2 2 4 0.200 0.0253 0.0253 0.0486 0.0486
2021-22 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 47 15 19 34 0.723 0.0922 0.0944 0.2288 0.2343
2022-23 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 45 26 22 48 1.067 0.1359 0.1330 0.3374 0.3302
2023-24 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 45 11 26 37 0.822 0.1047 0.0974 0.2601 0.2420
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 9 1 1 2 0.222
2024-25 New England College D3 LittleEast — 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · New England College
+16.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27963
Forward overall
#1605
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2010-11
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.