IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Greer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Tilton NE-Prep 22 3 5 8 0.364 0.0720 0.0720 0.1657 0.1657
2022-23 Tilton NE-Prep 24 2 5 7 0.292 0.0578 0.0578 0.1329 0.1329
2023-24 — EHL 42 2 16 18 0.429 0.0990 0.0983 0.2097 0.2083
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE SO 20 0 1 1 0.050
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE — 9 0 1 1 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · Nichols
+43.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14451
Defenseman overall
#2740
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lucas Hefty
Concordia · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Houlihan
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Lubczuk
SUNY Geneseo · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.