IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Deschamps Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 26 5 5 10 0.385 0.0762 0.0762 0.1752 0.1752
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 4 6 10 0.417 0.0825 0.0825 0.1898 0.1898
2022-23 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 31 1 7 8 0.258 0.0596 0.0594 0.1263 0.1258
2023-24 H.C. Rhode Island EHL 39 3 9 12 0.308 0.0711 0.0672 0.1506 0.1424
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nichols D3 CNE SO 9 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Nichols D3 CNE — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45846
Forward overall
#2989
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Carr
Wisconsin-Stout · 2006-07
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Warren Carter
Marian · 2011-12
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Farabee
Connecticut College · 2014-15
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.