IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Warren Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-01-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 44 22 27 49 1.114 0.1232 0.1172 0.3528 0.3356
2011-12 Flint Jr. Generals NA3HL 46 26 27 53 1.152 0.1274 0.1144 0.3650 0.3279
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA SR 28 8 9 17 0.607
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA JR 25 10 5 15 0.600
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA SO 19 4 4 8 0.421
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA FR 24 3 0 3 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2012-13 · Marian
+26.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19732
Forward overall
#712
Forward born in 1991
#419
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Turner Richards
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Nichols
Hamilton · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Tinoco
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.