← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Plaza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Pingree NE-Prep 28 0 6 6 0.214 0.0413 0.0413 0.0981 0.0981
2021-22 Pingree NE-Prep 25 5 12 17 0.680 0.1312 0.1312 0.3112 0.3112
2022-23 New England Wolves EHL 46 7 17 24 0.522 0.0763 0.0791 0.2558 0.2651
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 48 4 14 18 0.375 0.0867 0.0837 0.3032 0.2927
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 25 7 10 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2025-26 · Salve Regina
+779.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6823
Defenseman overall
#1641
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.