IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bauer Barry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-11-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chaska USHS-MN 25 5 17 22 0.880 0.1114 0.1114 0.2138 0.2138
2020-21 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 29 2 13 15 0.517 0.0649 0.0649 0.1633 0.1633
2021-22 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 32 0 5 5 0.156 0.0574 0.0556 0.1649 0.1597
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC — 23 0 14 14 0.609
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 26 1 7 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Concordia
+318.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13624
Defenseman overall
#2349
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nathan McDevitt
Post · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Lupo
Amherst · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Miglio
Utica · 2011-12
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.