IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Leavens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Hamilton Red Wings OJHL 47 10 11 21 0.447 0.1095 0.1217 0.3076 0.3418
2010-11 — OJHL 41 15 16 31 0.756 0.1853 0.1973 0.5206 0.5543
2011-12 Milton Menace OJHL 44 22 31 53 1.204 0.2952 0.3013 0.8293 0.8464
2012-13 Milton Menace OJHL 53 25 44 69 1.302 0.3191 0.3098 0.8964 0.8702
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 38 14 35 49 1.290
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 39 18 11 29 0.744
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 33 7 20 27 0.818
2013-14 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 26 1 2 3 0.115
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · Robert Morris
-56.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12560
Forward overall
#463
Forward born in 1993
#301
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Kevin Irwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Vermont (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Garret Clemment
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
John Simonson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Wahlin
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.