IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brennan Serville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-06-02 Country: Canada
2011 · Round 3, Pick #78  ·  Winnipeg Jets Winnipeg Jets
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 43 3 12 15 0.349 0.0855 0.0947 0.2401 0.2661
2010-11 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 36 3 27 30 0.833 0.2042 0.2168 0.5737 0.6090
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Michigan D1 BigTen SR 33 0 7 7 0.212
2013-14 Michigan D1 BigTen JR 33 0 3 3 0.091
2012-13 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SO 29 1 2 3 0.103
2011-12 Michigan D1 CCHA-orig FR 34 0 8 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2011-12 · Michigan
+48.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7468
Defenseman overall
#1031
Defenseman born in 1993
#1559
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jimmy Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Downing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Teemu Kivihalme
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Connor Clifton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Murphy
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ty Enns
Marian · 2015-16
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Savva Smirnov
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Raphael Robitaille
Norwich · 2002-03
1.240 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.