← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Schirm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-06-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Worcester Jr. Railers EHLP 13 0 1 1 0.077 0.0088 0.0088 0.0173 0.0173
2021-22 Bay State Bobcats NA3HL 47 4 17 21 0.447 0.0561 0.0608 0.1411 0.1529
2022-23 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 45 1 7 8 0.178 0.0411 0.0439 0.0870 0.0930
2023-24 Worcester Jr. Railers EHL 16 0 8 8 0.500 0.1155 0.1177 0.2447 0.2493
2024-25 Worcester Jr. Railers NCDC 50 3 6 9 0.180 0.0734 0.0700 0.1447 0.1380
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 UCHC FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2025-26 · Nazareth
+256.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14274
Defenseman overall
#2818
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2017-18
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2014-15
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.