IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hudson Perry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Walpole Express EHLP 32 18 7 25 0.781 0.0508 0.0502 0.1762 0.1741
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 17 16 33 0.733 0.1074 0.1071 0.3592 0.3581
2024-25 Express Hockey Club EHL 37 14 14 28 0.757 0.1108 0.1048 0.3707 0.3505
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC — 12 1 2 3 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2025-26 · Worcester State
+176.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23023
Forward overall
#1271
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danny Rock
SUNY Brockport · 2016-17
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lane Boswell
Marian · 2007-08
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Derlago
Utica · 2014-15
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.