IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gavin Brandon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampton NE-Prep 12 0 3 3 0.250 0.0482 0.0482 0.1144 0.1144
2021-22 New Hampton NE-Prep 28 4 3 7 0.250 0.0482 0.0482 0.1144 0.1144
2022-23 New Hampton NE-Prep 33 8 8 16 0.485 0.0935 0.0935 0.2218 0.2218
2023-24 — NCDC 29 2 2 4 0.138 0.0319 0.0314 0.1115 0.1099
2024-25 Connecticut Nor'Easter EHL 39 18 20 38 0.974 0.1426 0.1361 0.4777 0.4559
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 15 1 2 3 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2025-26 · St. John Fisher
+147.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26417
Forward overall
#1502
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2018-19
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Croteau
Lebanon Valley · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Shaheen
Endicott · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.