IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Morris Schneider Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kimball Union NE-Prep 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0205 0.0205 0.0471 0.0471
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 1 7 8 0.242 0.0480 0.0480 0.1104 0.1104
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.0927 0.0938 0.1827 0.1848
2024-25 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.1112 0.1076 0.2192 0.2120
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 19 0 3 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2025-26 · Stevenson
+63.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12347
Defenseman overall
#2529
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brian Bachnak
Adrian · 2014-15
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Boswell
Nichols · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam DiBrina
Curry · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.