← New Search ↗ Social Card

Franco Canevari Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blaine USHS-MN 22 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Blaine USHS-MN 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0062 0.0062 0.0121 0.0121
2021-22 Wayzata USHS-MN 26 5 2 7 0.269 0.0332 0.0332 0.0654 0.0654
2023-24 Idaho Falls Spud Kings NCDC 25 1 5 6 0.240 0.0555 0.0544 0.1941 0.1902
2024-25 Kemptville 73's CCHL 34 1 13 14 0.412 0.0893 0.0818 0.3188 0.2918
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Augsburg
+149.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14878
Defenseman overall
#2890
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.