← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Clarner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-01-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 0 1 1 0.030 0.0060 0.0060 0.0138 0.0138
2022-23 Kimball Union NE-Prep 33 1 3 4 0.121 0.0240 0.0240 0.0552 0.0552
2023-24 Kimball Union NE-Prep 37 0 7 7 0.189 0.0375 0.0375 0.0862 0.0862
2024-25 EHL 19 2 5 7 0.368 0.0851 0.0846 0.1803 0.1793
2025-26 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 17 1 7 8 0.471 0.1087 0.1019 0.2303 0.2160
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D2 NE10 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · St. Michael's College
+101.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14794
Defenseman overall
#2829
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Western New England · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chatham · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.