IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cyril Jebousek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-02-02 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 32 1 7 8 0.250 0.0578 0.0607 0.1223 0.1283
2023-24 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 24 1 2 3 0.125 0.0289 0.0289 0.0612 0.0611
2024-25 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 46 9 31 40 0.870 0.2009 0.1904 0.4255 0.4032
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Connecticut D3 LittleEast FR 17 0 2 2 0.118
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Western Connecticut
-1.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8870
Defenseman overall
#1997
Defenseman born in 2004
#1132
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Currie
Adrian · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Ross
Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christian George
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.