← New Search ↗ Social Card

Devin England Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier 39 7 13 20 0.513 0.0578 0.0600 0.1745 0.1811
2023-24 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 37 4 9 13 0.351 0.0514 0.0522 0.1723 0.1751
2024-25 Pennsylvania Huntsmen EHL 44 12 14 26 0.591 0.0864 0.0834 0.2897 0.2795
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Misericordia D3 MAC 17 1 0 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2025-26 · Misericordia
-3.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32661
Forward overall
#1964
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2013-14
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.