IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Pollock Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 50 11 7 18 0.360 0.0781 0.0799 0.2787 0.2851
2023-24 — CCHL 51 7 9 16 0.314 0.0680 0.0659 0.2428 0.2355
2024-25 Nepean Raiders CCHL 50 12 16 28 0.560 0.1215 0.1123 0.4335 0.4008
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 19 1 0 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2025-26 · Canton
-34.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38640
Forward overall
#2442
Forward born in 2004
#1012
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Derek Britner
UMass Dartmouth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Kontny
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.