IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Conlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 24 0 6 6 0.250 0.0705 0.0705 0.1144 0.1144
2022-23 Williston-Northampton NE-Prep 30 2 8 10 0.333 0.0940 0.0940 0.1525 0.1525
2023-24 — EHL 31 0 6 6 0.194 0.0681 0.0684 0.0949 0.0954
2024-25 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0168 0.0155 0.0407 0.0374
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. John Fisher D3 UCHC FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25347
Defenseman overall
#4051
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jacob Switzer
Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin O'Leary
Trinity · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Goupille
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.