← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Switzer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 55 0 7 7 0.127 0.0474 0.0462 0.1855 0.1807
2015-16 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 53 0 5 5 0.094 0.0351 0.0323 0.1374 0.1265
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 18 0 1 1 0.056
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 SR 18 0 1 1 0.056
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 23 0 4 4 0.174
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 JR 23 0 4 4 0.174
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 26 1 3 4 0.154
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 SO 26 1 3 4 0.154
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 2 8 10 0.400
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 FR 25 2 8 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Concordia
+1020.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27846
Defenseman overall
#2755
Defenseman born in 1995
#3760
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2004-05
0.148 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2014-15
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.