IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derrick Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1984-03-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 46 9 3 12 0.261 0.0833 0.0906 0.2020 0.2196
2001-02 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 22 2 10 12 0.545 0.1742 0.1813 0.4223 0.4394
2002-03 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 38 9 16 25 0.658 0.2101 0.2090 0.5093 0.5066
2003-04 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 39 12 15 27 0.692 0.2211 0.2089 0.5359 0.5062
2004-05 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 56 26 22 48 0.857 0.2737 0.2466 0.6635 0.5977
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Elmira D3 — JR 22 5 4 9 0.409
2006-07 Elmira D3 — SO 23 1 5 6 0.261
2005-06 Elmira D3 — FR 27 2 2 4 0.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2005-06 · Elmira
-25.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22119
Forward overall
#630
Forward born in 1984
#532
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Lopez
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Berglund
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.