IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Conacher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Burlington Cougars OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Burlington Cougars OJHL 46 14 28 42 0.913 0.2743 0.2913 0.6249 0.6636
2012-13 — OJHL 51 28 29 57 1.118 0.3357 0.3398 0.7650 0.7743
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Canisius D1 AHA JR 39 20 26 46 1.179
2014-15 Canisius D1 AHA SO 37 11 26 37 1.000
2013-14 Canisius D1 AHA FR 32 6 17 23 0.719
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2013-14 · Canisius
+162.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14724
Forward overall
#605
Forward born in 1994
#572
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Max Coatta
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jack Rowe
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brian Morgan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schmidt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Swanson
St. Thomas · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barone
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.