IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Minello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-06-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Huntsville Otters OJHL 43 16 32 48 1.116 0.2736 0.2790 0.7683 0.7834
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 55 25 34 59 1.073 0.2629 0.2550 0.7383 0.7160
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 37 17 13 30 0.811
2015-16 Sacred Heart D1 AHA JR 34 10 13 23 0.676
2014-15 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SO 37 14 11 25 0.676
2013-14 Sacred Heart D1 AHA FR 36 9 11 20 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2013-14 · Sacred Heart
+145.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14046
Forward overall
#506
Forward born in 1993
#401
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brett Skibba
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ UConn (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alfred Larsson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Stevens
Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2006-07
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Gaffney
Utica · 2007-08
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.