IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Powers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-06-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — OJHL 31 1 7 8 0.258 0.0633 0.0677 0.1777 0.1901
2012-13 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 54 9 28 37 0.685 0.1679 0.1713 0.4718 0.4813
2013-14 — OJHL 47 11 27 38 0.808 0.1982 0.1921 0.5567 0.5395
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 41 2 12 14 0.342
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 28 0 3 3 0.107
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#7267
Defenseman overall
#1130
Defenseman born in 1994
#1517
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Rudy
Hobart · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stefano Alonzi
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2013-14
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.