IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Seney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-02-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Collingwood Blues OJHL 49 3 7 10 0.204 0.0570 0.0630 0.1408 0.1555
2013-14 Collingwood Blues OJHL 49 26 43 69 1.408 0.3935 0.4145 0.9718 1.0238
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 37 13 19 32 0.865
2016-17 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 36 10 21 31 0.861
2015-16 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SO 32 8 18 26 0.812
2014-15 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast FR 34 11 15 26 0.765
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2014-15 · Merrimack
+226.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14103
Forward overall
#553
Forward born in 1996
#827
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Motte
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
Evan Allen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
John Hayden
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Yale (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Scott Conway
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Penn State (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Kelleher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Wiesner
Babson · 2015-16
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Michaud
Trinity · 2014-15
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.