IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Keenan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-22 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 51 5 8 13 0.255 0.0625 0.0701 0.1755 0.1968
2015-16 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 43 23 21 44 1.023 0.2508 0.2674 0.7045 0.7512
2016-17 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 48 16 46 62 1.292 0.3166 0.3234 0.8893 0.9084
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Princeton D1 ECAC — 31 2 4 6 0.194
2020-21 Princeton D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Princeton D1 ECAC JR 31 7 11 18 0.581
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC SO 30 3 2 5 0.167
2017-18 Princeton D1 ECAC FR 36 2 5 7 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2017-18 · Princeton
-24.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16921
Forward overall
#792
Forward born in 1998
#586
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Devin Niles
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marc Rubino
Lake Forest · 2008-09
0.913 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2009-10
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.