IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Petrucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 — OJHL 39 13 12 25 0.641 0.1571 0.1583 0.4413 0.4448
2016-17 Toronto Patriots OJHL 52 26 32 58 1.115 0.2734 0.2633 0.7680 0.7396
2017-18 Toronto Patriots OJHL 54 52 48 100 1.852 0.4539 0.4153 1.2750 1.1666
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 RIT D1 AHA GR 39 3 5 8 0.205
2021-22 RIT D1 AHA SR 35 1 1 2 0.057
2020-21 RIT D1 AHA JR 19 3 0 3 0.158
2019-20 RIT D1 AHA SO 22 1 4 5 0.227
2018-19 RIT D1 AHA FR 28 3 2 5 0.179
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2018-19 · RIT
-41.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9140
Forward overall
#424
Forward born in 1997
#131
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Eric Scheid
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brady Fleurent
University of New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Galati
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Braydon Beahm
St. Norbert · 2024-25
0.968 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.