IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brenden Locke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 56 27 28 55 0.982 0.1673 0.1923 0.4162 0.4783
2014-15 Abitibi Eskimos NOJHL 46 41 40 81 1.761 0.2999 0.3273 0.7463 0.8144
2015-16 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 50 16 25 41 0.820 0.2010 0.2065 0.5644 0.5797
2016-17 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 38 19 27 46 1.210 0.2967 0.2915 0.8332 0.8185
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC — 32 6 12 18 0.562
2020-21 Cornell D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 29 8 18 26 0.897
2018-19 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 31 7 11 18 0.581
2017-18 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 31 2 15 17 0.548
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2017-18 · Cornell
+148.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13098
Forward overall
#594
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Judd Peterson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Fossen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Opperman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Park
Buffalo State · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Pearson
Concordia · 2014-15
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Carr
SUNY Oswego · 2009-10
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.