← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Loft Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0501 0.0549 0.1141 0.1251
2016-17 Mississauga Chargers OJHL 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0300 0.0315 0.0684 0.0719
2018-19 French River Rapids NOJHL 50 13 24 37 0.740 0.1882 0.1810 0.3070 0.2952
2019-20 French River Rapids NOJHL 28 5 12 17 0.607 0.1544 0.1544 0.2519 0.2519
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 26 1 10 11 0.423
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 26 1 10 11 0.423
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 26 1 10 11 0.423
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 26 1 10 11 0.423
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 26 1 10 11 0.423
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 26 1 10 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2020-21 · Niagara
+269.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16064
Defenseman overall
#2631
Defenseman born in 1999
#3781
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2011-12
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2005-06
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.