IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dustyn McFaul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-08-04 Country: Canada
2018 · Round 6, Pick #181  ·  Boston Bruins Boston Bruins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Pickering Panthers OJHL 38 4 15 19 0.500 0.1226 0.1318 0.3443 0.3702
2018-19 Pickering Panthers OJHL 48 3 13 16 0.333 0.0817 0.0839 0.2295 0.2355
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Clarkson D1 ECAC GR 35 3 0 3 0.086
2022-23 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 30 0 9 9 0.300
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 34 2 4 6 0.176
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 19 0 3 3 0.158
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 31 1 6 7 0.226
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2019-20 · Clarkson
+132.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14170
Defenseman overall
#2350
Defenseman born in 2000
#2852
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Zach Yoder
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy Mazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan McElhinny
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Pijus Rulevicius
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Anton
Lebanon Valley · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.