← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Gilberds Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Toronto Patriots OJHL 49 4 12 16 0.327 0.0981 0.1048 0.2235 0.2389
2019-20 Timmins Rock NOJHL 55 18 18 36 0.654 0.1664 0.1664 0.2716 0.2716
2020-21 Timmins Rock NOJHL 22 8 4 12 0.545 0.1387 0.1387 0.2263 0.2263
2021-22 Timmins Rock NOJHL 43 16 21 37 0.861 0.2188 0.2007 0.3570 0.3274
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 7 2 1 3 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2020-21 · Niagara
+377.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31137
Forward overall
#1652
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2004-05
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Finlandia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2004-05
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.