IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian McGarry Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-02-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Aurora Tigers OJHL 14 3 7 10 0.714 0.1751 0.1628 0.8564 0.8029
2005-06 Sudbury Cubs NOJHL 47 48 61 109 2.319 0.3873 0.3558 0.9654 0.8870
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 6 0 1 1 0.167
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA — 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2020-21 · Mercyhurst
-30.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8673
Forward overall
#271
Forward born in 1985

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Oldcorn
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Henderson
Marian · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Harrison Niemann
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.