← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Hewitt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Toronto Patriots OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 North York Rangers OJHL 48 3 11 14 0.292 0.0715 0.0733 0.2008 0.2060
2022-23 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 50 14 29 43 0.860 0.3506 0.3526 0.6913 0.6952
2023-24 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 29 3 21 24 0.828 0.3374 0.3202 0.6652 0.6313
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC SO 17 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2024-25 · Brown
-73.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1686
Defenseman overall
#348
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Babson · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2017-18
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.