IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Fukakusa Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-08-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 King Rebellion OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 21 67 88 1.660 0.4070 0.3996 1.1432 1.1224
2022-23 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 35 70 105 1.981 0.4856 0.4520 1.3640 1.2695
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 36 3 17 20 0.556
2024-25 RIT D1 AHA — 35 9 27 36 1.029
2023-24 RIT D1 AHA — 39 9 19 28 0.718
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2023-24 · RIT
+94.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4705
Forward overall
#180
Forward born in 2002
#9
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Saini
Adrian · 2023-24
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nesper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2007-08
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott McNulty
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.