IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andy Reist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 49 17 12 29 0.592 0.1778 0.1901 0.4051 0.4332
2022-23 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 48 38 31 69 1.438 0.4318 0.4397 0.9840 1.0020
2023-24 Cobourg Cougars OJHL 52 35 60 95 1.827 0.5488 0.5303 1.2505 1.2084
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara D1 AHA SO 34 1 8 9 0.265
2024-25 Niagara D1 AHA — 32 1 7 8 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.42
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2024-25 · Niagara
-40.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
42%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7664
Forward overall
#282
Forward born in 2004
#102
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dominik Shine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.90 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robbie Payne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Desmet
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
1.391 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan DiScanio
New England · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Maucieri
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.