← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cristian Giancola Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-04-05 Country: Canada
Clarkson
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Toronto Patriots OJHL 42 7 8 15 0.357 0.0875 0.0972 0.2459 0.2731
2024-25 Toronto Patriots OJHL 32 5 8 13 0.406 0.0996 0.1055 0.2797 0.2963
2025-26 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 14 3 2 5 0.357 0.0875 0.0879 0.2459 0.2472
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44373
Forward overall
#1983
Forward born in 2007
#3070
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

Clarkson Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHL 2021-22
0.29
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
NAHL 2018-19
0.22
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
NAHL 2013-14
0.54
actual FR PPG at Clarkson
CCHL 2022-23
0.50
actual FR PPG at Clarkson

D2/3 Comparables

Bowdoin · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2019-20
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.