| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Pembroke Lumber Kings | CCHL | 47 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 0.277 | 0.0600 | 0.0695 | 0.2141 | 0.2479 |
| 2005-06 | Kitchener Rangers | OHL | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.333 | 0.1928 | 0.2120 | 0.8541 | 0.9390 |
| 2006-07 | Kitchener Rangers | OHL | 59 | 0 | 19 | 19 | 0.322 | 0.1863 | 0.1949 | 0.8251 | 0.8630 |
| 2007-08 | Kitchener Rangers | OHL | 65 | 1 | 17 | 18 | 0.277 | 0.1602 | 0.1597 | 0.7096 | 0.7072 |
| 2008-09 | Kitchener Rangers | OHL | 44 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 0.341 | 0.1972 | 0.1870 | 0.8736 | 0.8284 |
| 2009-10 | Kitchener Rangers | OHL | 58 | 6 | 21 | 27 | 0.466 | 0.2693 | 0.2425 | 1.1928 | 1.0739 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Tufts | D3 | — | SR | 25 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.200 |
| 2016-17 | Tufts | D3 | — | JR | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.125 |
| 2015-16 | Tufts | D3 | — | SO | 18 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.222 |
| 2014-15 | Tufts | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.