IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Vautour Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 37 12 19 31 0.838 0.1817 0.1817 0.6482 0.6482
2001-02 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 52 22 28 50 0.962 0.2085 0.2085 0.7439 0.7439
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 22 3 6 9 0.409
2004-05 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 23 8 7 15 0.652
2003-04 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 26 8 13 21 0.808
2002-03 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 26 5 4 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2002-03 · Hamilton
+104.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16969
Forward overall
#240
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2000-01
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Sharkey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Dante Spagnuolo
Adrian · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.