IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Lambert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — CCHL 53 11 8 19 0.358 0.0778 0.0820 0.2774 0.2924
2001-02 Navan Grads CCHL 55 18 25 43 0.782 0.1696 0.1709 0.6049 0.6094
2002-03 Navan Grads CCHL 49 28 41 69 1.408 0.3054 0.2937 1.0895 1.0476
2003-04 Navan Grads CCHL 49 23 39 62 1.265 0.2744 0.2501 0.9790 0.8924
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 RIT D1 AHA SR 37 21 30 51 1.378
2006-07 RIT D1 AHA JR 34 17 26 43 1.265
2005-06 RIT D1 AHA SO 28 16 18 34 1.214
2004-05 RIT D1 AHA FR 21 8 12 20 0.952
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.95
2004-05 · RIT
+315.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10111
Forward overall
#369
Forward born in 1983
#79
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.