IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Simon Lambert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 — CCHL 53 11 8 19 0.358 0.1145 0.1207 0.2775 0.2925
2001-02 Navan Grads CCHL 55 18 25 43 0.782 0.2496 0.2515 0.6052 0.6097
2002-03 Navan Grads CCHL 49 28 41 69 1.408 0.4496 0.4323 1.0901 1.0482
2003-04 Navan Grads CCHL 49 23 39 62 1.265 0.4040 0.3683 0.9795 0.8928
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 RIT D1 AHA SR 37 21 30 51 1.378
2006-07 RIT D1 AHA JR 34 17 26 43 1.265
2005-06 RIT D1 AHA SO 28 16 18 34 1.214
2004-05 RIT D1 — FR 21 8 12 20 0.952
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.95
2004-05 · RIT
+182.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9630
Forward overall
#340
Forward born in 1983
#95
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andrew Romano
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Storjohann
SUNY Cortland · 2016-17
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
James Willis
Manhattanville · 2000-01
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.