| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Smiths Falls Bears | CCHL | 58 | 6 | 34 | 40 | 0.690 | 0.1496 | 0.1496 | 0.5339 | 0.5339 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Hobart | D3 | — | SR | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.071 |
| 2008-09 | Hobart | D3 | — | JR | 20 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.300 |
| 2007-08 | Hobart | D3 | — | SO | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.167 |
| 2006-07 | Hobart | D3 | — | FR | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 |
| 2001-02 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | SO | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.