IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Laliberte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 55 2 7 9 0.164 0.0522 0.0590 0.1266 0.1431
2007-08 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 43 48 91 1.542 0.4925 0.5332 1.1940 1.2927
2008-09 — CCHL 50 42 48 90 1.800 0.5747 0.5885 1.3934 1.4269
2009-10 Cornwall Colts CCHL 50 62 48 110 2.200 0.7025 0.6870 1.7030 1.6654
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 62 63 70 133 2.145 0.6850 0.6360 1.6606 1.5418
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 RPI D1 ECAC — 32 8 18 26 0.812
2012-13 RPI D1 ECAC — 34 11 17 28 0.824
2011-12 RPI D1 ECAC — 31 5 9 14 0.452
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.61
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2011-12 · RPI
-26.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3236
Forward overall
#156
Forward born in 1990
#2
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Novak
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mike Szmatula
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.51 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alessio Luciani
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.