IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Laliberte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-15 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 55 2 7 9 0.164 0.0355 0.0401 0.1266 0.1431
2007-08 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 59 43 48 91 1.542 0.3345 0.3621 1.1934 1.2920
2008-09 — CCHL 50 42 48 90 1.800 0.3904 0.3998 1.3927 1.4262
2009-10 Cornwall Colts CCHL 50 62 48 110 2.200 0.4772 0.4667 1.7021 1.6646
2010-11 Cornwall Colts CCHL 62 63 70 133 2.145 0.4653 0.4320 1.6597 1.5410
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 RPI D1 ECAC — 32 8 18 26 0.812
2012-13 RPI D1 ECAC — 34 11 17 28 0.824
2011-12 RPI D1 ECAC — 31 5 9 14 0.452
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2011-12 · RPI
+18.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3328
Forward overall
#159
Forward born in 1990
#2
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Bonner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alessio Luciani
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Miller
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Conlan Keenan
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.