← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Watt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Nepean Raiders CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Nepean Raiders CCHL 55 2 13 15 0.273 0.0591 0.0646 0.2089 0.2284
2011-12 Nepean Raiders CCHL 61 9 14 23 0.377 0.0818 0.0852 0.2888 0.3009
2012-13 Nepean Raiders CCHL 59 10 28 38 0.644 0.1397 0.1394 0.4934 0.4923
2013-14 Nepean Raiders CCHL 51 14 31 45 0.882 0.1914 0.1815 0.6759 0.6408
2014-15 — CCHL 59 16 22 38 0.644 0.1397 0.1260 0.4934 0.4450
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Robert Morris D1 AHA SR 35 0 2 2 0.057
2017-18 Robert Morris D1 AHA JR 30 2 3 5 0.167
2016-17 Robert Morris D1 AHA SO 25 2 6 8 0.320
2015-16 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2015-16 · Robert Morris
-21.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24374
Forward overall
#937
Forward born in 1994
#482
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2023-24
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2007-08
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.