← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly Summers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-04-29 Country: Canada
2014 · Round 6, Pick #189  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
Signed Professionally
Eispiraten Crimmitschau · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2012-13 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 13 20 33 0.559 0.1213 0.1351 0.4327 0.4821
2013-14 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 56 17 43 60 1.071 0.2324 0.2473 0.8289 0.8822
2020-21 Eispiraten Crimmitschau DEL2 42 6 22 28 0.667 0.8931 0.8931 1.1963 1.1963
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 40 6 24 30 0.750
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 39 3 14 17 0.436
2015-16 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 37 3 11 14 0.378
2014-15 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 33 6 4 10 0.303
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2014-15 · Clarkson
+58.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3685
Defenseman overall
#703
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Northland (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Michigan (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2014-15
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.