IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maxime St-Pierre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Navan Grads CCHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0542 0.0604 0.1934 0.2154
2013-14 Navan Grads CCHL 57 15 18 33 0.579 0.1256 0.1336 0.4479 0.4765
2014-15 — CCHL 43 5 10 15 0.349 0.0757 0.0770 0.2699 0.2747
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 57 11 28 39 0.684 0.1484 0.1439 0.5294 0.5132
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 5 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#32131
Forward overall
#1364
Forward born in 1996
#724
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jim Pentecost
Curry · 2004-05
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Easton Ryan
Hobart · 2022-23
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.