IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Leslie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-11 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rockland Nationals CCHL 23 6 11 17 0.739 0.2109 0.2177 0.5721 0.5906
2015-16 — CCHL 57 13 16 29 0.509 0.1452 0.1429 0.3939 0.3876
2016-17 Navan Grads CCHL 62 9 17 26 0.419 0.1197 0.1115 0.3247 0.3025
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Hamilton D3 — SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2006-07 Hamilton D3 — SO 19 1 5 6 0.316
2005-06 Hamilton D3 — FR 11 1 5 6 0.545

NCAAe Rankings

#27939
Forward overall
#1194
Forward born in 1996
#965
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Renaud
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Lang
Saint Anselm · 2025-26
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Kelley
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.