IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Benedict Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 42 2 3 5 0.119 0.0149 0.0146 0.0376 0.0369
2015-16 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 8 0 2 2 0.250 0.0314 0.0293 0.0789 0.0737
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 29 12 13 25 0.862
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 29 12 13 25 0.862
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 29 12 13 25 0.862
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 29 12 13 25 0.862
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 29 12 13 25 0.862
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 — — 29 12 13 25 0.862
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2020-21 · Calvin University
+4210.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#62278
Forward overall
#2911
Forward born in 1995
#5354
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Prpich
Wisconsin-Superior · 2011-12
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Flynn
Worcester State · 2015-16
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Gilchrist
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.