IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Gilchrist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-06-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Buffalo Lightning OJHL 22 1 4 5 0.227 0.0557 0.0590 0.1565 0.1657
2006-07 — OJHL 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 — OJHL 41 0 11 11 0.268 0.0658 0.0634 0.1847 0.1780
2008-09 — OJHL 41 4 15 19 0.463 0.1136 0.1036 0.3191 0.2911
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 6 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 25 2 2 4 0.160
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
+93.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18951
Defenseman overall
#1643
Defenseman born in 1988
#3688
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Demetri Sakaris
Southern Maine · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jack Robinson
Suffolk · 2023-24
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hoy
Adrian · 2012-13
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.