← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louis Chabot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-23 Country: England
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rockland Nationals CCHL 6 2 0 2 0.333 0.1064 0.1173 0.2580 0.2845
2018-19 CCHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0266 0.0281 0.0645 0.0682
2019-20 Nepean Raiders CCHL 48 3 9 12 0.250 0.0798 0.0798 0.1935 0.1935
2020-21 Nepean Raiders CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Nepean Raiders CCHL 54 7 10 17 0.315 0.1005 0.0911 0.2437 0.2208
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 27 7 11 18 0.667
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 27 7 11 18 0.667
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 27 7 11 18 0.667
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 27 7 11 18 0.667
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 27 7 11 18 0.667
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 27 7 11 18 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2020-21 · Niagara
+1121.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#51537
Forward overall
#3097
Forward born in 2001
#1927
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.