← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Millar Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 27 0 3 3 0.111 0.0139 0.0145 0.0351 0.0367
2015-16 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 45 4 6 10 0.222 0.0279 0.0278 0.0701 0.0698
2016-17 Bozeman Ice Dogs NA3HL 46 19 24 43 0.935 0.1173 0.1109 0.2951 0.2790
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 University of Rhode Island ACHA_D1 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#42723
Forward overall
#1897
Forward born in 1996
#2340
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2005-06
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.