IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Freel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 11 0 4 4 0.364 0.0789 0.0851 0.2813 0.3036
2019-20 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 61 26 19 45 0.738 0.1600 0.1600 0.5708 0.5708
2021-22 Ottawa Jr. Senators CCHL 51 35 26 61 1.196 0.2594 0.2405 0.9254 0.8579
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 34 4 10 14 0.412
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 38 11 7 18 0.474
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 37 6 16 22 0.595
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 36 2 13 15 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2022-23 · Maine
+172.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18589
Forward overall
#870
Forward born in 2001
#302
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Krapian
Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Prappas
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
R.J. Kleiman
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.