← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tucker Shields Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rockland Nationals CCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Rockland Nationals CCHL 51 8 9 17 0.333 0.0723 0.0735 0.2553 0.2595
2022-23 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 57 26 29 55 0.965 0.1643 0.1587 0.4089 0.3949
2023-24 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 52 14 27 41 0.788 0.1343 0.1227 0.3342 0.3053
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 28 8 9 17 0.607
2024-25 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 28 8 9 17 0.607
2023-24 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 28 8 9 17 0.607
2022-23 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 28 8 9 17 0.607
2021-22 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 28 8 9 17 0.607
2020-21 Liberty University ACHA_D1 — — 28 8 9 17 0.607

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31297
Forward overall
#1842
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2024-25
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.